Visualizzazione post con etichetta 1/2400. Mostra tutti i post
Visualizzazione post con etichetta 1/2400. Mostra tutti i post

lunedì 16 dicembre 2013

1st November 1914, off the Coronel

Last week we decided to go for a Naval Thunder scenario (it was a scenario from Station Manned and Ready, indeed... but we recycled it for NT). Usually when we play Naval Thunder, we like to put on table as many ship as we can, both for sake of painting glory and for letting more people to join us. Therefore, we often play Jutland-like battles, lasting 4 or 5 hours and usually with uncertain results (a part a lot of fun!).
With this small scenario, we gave a new deal to our naval warfare. Infact, it involves no more then 4 vassels per side, with the biggest ones being Armoured Cruisers.

Here come a brief description of the events introducing this scenario:
1st November 1914, The German Pacific Squadron under Admiral Von Spee was cruising carrying out commerce raids at the start of the First World War. The British, French and Japanese had squadrons searching for him at the start of the war, reminiscent of the search for the ship bearing his name at the start of the Second World War. The British squadron under Cradock intercepted him off the coast of Chile, and
after a one sided fight, the British Cruisers were annihilated.


as you can read, it was a one side action, with the British best achievement being surviving...
I suggested some victory conditions in order to equilibrate it a little bit. I've arranged a long table (2 mt long, 1,5 wide) with the Royal Navy starting on left side when the Hochseeflotte tries to intercept them from the middle of the table (so, it would roughly be as the RN was bearing westward and the germans came from north side of the table).
The brits would gain a victory point each ship they can bring out of the table from west end, 2 point if they do so with the slow armed merchantman (the Otranto), but they can get 2 victory point if the expose themselves to the more powerful german guns and get to sunk an enemy ship.
From other side, germans will get 1 victory point each british ship they'll sink and 2 points if they sink the Otranto.

With this in mind, let's review the forces on the water:
Royal Navy:
AC HMS Good Hope a decent AC, with 9" guns
AC HMS Monmouth (proxed with AC Warrior) a very light AC, with only 6" and 3" guns on it...
CL Glasgow (proxed with CL Bristol)
AMC Otranto (proxed with CL Aurora) slow and heavy ship, but with a good resistance to hits...

Hochseeflotte
AC Scharnhorst,
AC Gneisenau
CL Leipzig
CL Nürnberg
CL Dresden
CL Emden (as this last cruisers arrived only in the last part of the battle, we omitted it in this scenario)

The game was fun, with a lot of evasive manouvres, smoke curtains layered to cover slow ships, some big bangs from both sides, with the brits which nearly escaped the germans. Nearly. Germans lost 2 small CLs, and an AC, but have sunk almost everything on the table, apart of the merchantman, which was still afloat but, as it had lost almost every ship from his escort, she lowered her colours...

 
the British choose a convoy formation, bearing WSW


a close-up to the convoy, with CL performing an evasive manouver, trying to keep formation with the slow and encoumbered Otranto.

 Germans advance with a double line formation, full speed.
The german, after having succesfully intercept the british ships, but having suffered badly from 9" guns of Good Hope, performed a cleaver screening of the nearly sunk AC on the right. In the meanwhile, the Monmouth keep suffering from two fires on the bridge and a flooding...





 Hey, what a good paint job on the Good Hope's sea base here... I'm proud! and it is my favourite ship too!

here below the nasty germans from Werther collection






the Magdeburg is showing some secondary damages on the superstructures...

mercoledì 11 settembre 2013

Projects, Work in Progress and Old Favourites...

I'm definitely not a compulsive wargamer... I do not buy the last ruleset on the market on day 1 nor do I start a new project every month to abandon it as soon as I got the minis in my mailbox...
But nonetheless, I fall in love very often for new periods, miniature lines, different scales and extravagant projects. So, I fear I can still be categorized on the compulsive/maniac side of the hobby... how sad...
The main difference is that I never (and I have to underline this word never) abandon or end a project.
I still regularly paint (and have game with) my first wargaming love: 1/72 plastic napoleonic with which I've began my career back in the early 90s.

The only big move on has came 5 years ago, when I did halt all my fantasy, sci-fi and GW, sold a part of them and definitely stuck myself on historical wargame only (and the only regret I feel is toward my local GW distributor, whose yearly balance has had a big flex due to my decision... sorry Igor!).
Therefore, I like to put a little order on my wargamers mind categorizing my actual and future WIP.
please consider that these projects would never meet an end. I firmly minded to continue to buy/paint/have games with all of them. It could be happen I'll left something behind for a short time. or even a long period break. But I think I'll find all these periods/projects still interesting and worthwhile in the next 10, 50, 100 years to come...

so, let start categorizing: I'll divide my projects in "actually playing", that means I have a very good selection of them painted and I've many games with them during the year (I do not play with unpainted/primed minis), "collecting and painting" which are developing projects, not yet arrived to a game or, sometimes, for which I haven't found an opponent and. "future interests" which group both seriously thought future projects and some itching extemporary inspiration from my fellows or from blogs...

ACTUALLY PLAYING
  • 15 mm WWII, mainly from battlefront, for Flames of War games (that is my most played system, actually, I'm also involved in tournaments...).
  • 28 mm WWII, warlords, artizan, offensive miniatures, that I'm playing with Bolt Action rules (but I'm thinking to give a try to the new Chain of Command from the TooFatLardies guys...)
  • 1/2400 WWI naval wargame, with model exclusively from GHQ, using Naval Thunder rules
  • 1/72 napoleonics, various plastic soldiers companies, with Lasalle ruleset
 COLLECTING AND PAINTING
  • 10 mm Franco Prussian War and 1866 wars, mainly from Pendraken, but with some raids on Magister Militum camp, this is a well set project, with other 3 guys actively painting their armies in order to have, in a short time, some big clashes using 1866/70 rules.
  • 6 mm Yom Kippur War, with GHQ 1/285 models. Still uncertain on rules, Cold War Commander or A Fistful of TOWs? we'll see... we'd like to have a game on october, just to give a commemorative tribute...
  • 28mm Old West from Artizan... but just a small skirmish band of 10 7th Cav. soldiers.
  • 15 mm napoleonics from AB ranges... just for painting sake.
  • 1/1200 napoleonic ship of the line, Langton and GHQ... how lovely are these models... I've even find a new opponent...
  • 1/2400 WWII naval on pacific front. GHQ models at various stage between mounting, priming and thinking on colour scheme...
  • 1/285 WWII aircrafts, GHQ and Raiden miniature stuff. very lovely, I'll play with Bag the Huns 2 rules as soon as I get someone to involve in...
  • 28 mm (or more closely 30 mm), WWI early war english army from Renegade miniatures.
  • a small Dystopian War french fleet (yes I know, I've said no more fantasy nor sci-fi on my workbench... but these are so lovely...)
  • ... and from the bottom of my models drawer, some very old projects: a late roman army in 15 mm (Magister Militum) and very old 25 mm Foundry Carthaginians, originally thought for WAB.
FUTURE INTERESTS
what a dreadful category... so many future interests...
  • I'm spotting, almost everyday, on the web for Eureka' and Old Glory 15s' Seven Year War Prussian, French and Austrian... I think this new project is very close to step up to the above category...
  • I'd like to give a try to the AK47 Republic ruleset from Peter Pig, with a couple of armies from their beautiful range...
  • 1/1200 ironclads from various sources for Lissa... no idea which rules nor against whom to play.
  • 1/600 Thoroughbred's ironclads. Really like to put together two small river fleets and let them discuss their points of view about federal politic on the game tables...


martedì 30 luglio 2013

WAR SHORES

Last friday night at The Club we enjoyed a very though naval engagement, between my British Home Fleet and W.'s Hochseeflotte...
We did it with Naval Thunder: Clash of Dreadnoughts (http://navalthunder.com/), a ruleset we really like for WWI sea wargaming, and GHQ 1/2400 micronauts range (and I really do not have to tell you how beautiful are these models).
It is amazing to see how fluid and challenging could be a naval battle with miniatures.
we started on the short end of our sea table, 2 division each side, mine formed by a battleships division (BB Queen Elizabeth, Ajax and the old and slow King Edward VII) supported by 3 Light Cruisers (CL Waymounth, Bristol and Aurora) and a Battlecuisers division formed by 3 Battlecruisers (BC Lion, Tiger and Inflexible) flanked by a single Armoured Cruiser (Good Hope) and a Destroyers Flottilla. on the other side the Huns fielded 2 Battleship, 3 Battlecruisers, 3 Lightcruisers and 2 Flottillas of Destroyers.
Then we had 2 fast turns of manouvering in order to achive a good firing angle, and after another turn to close the ranges, we started to hammering targets with steel...
In a naval wargame you have to consider a lot of factor when moving your units: formation and division's coherence, firing ranges and target bearing. Not last you have to keep and eye opened every move to avoid torpedoes... and that was our game. Simultaneously planned moves, trying to keep targets under range with as many turrets was possible and trying to guess were those damned destroyers were heading to.
The outcome, after 3-4 hours of funny hits and miss on the Critical Hit table, was... well... unsatisfactory. but quite historical too: a Draw. a lot of minor unit losts (I've lost my destroyers and most of my light cruisers and, on the other side, both destroyer's flottillase were sunk and only a single cruiser could head home safely) but all the main units were sailing home safely (with some scratches...).
I do not count this result as a fault in the rules. they are clever and well written, fun, simple to manage and to play, with a lot (really a lot) of suspence on each "critical hit" roll and they are absoluting more on the simulation side, with a lot of details to consider when moving or firing... (the only minus, IMHO, is the 90° turning angle... I really cannot swallow it).
The problem is hidden in the period.
During WWI, sea battles were maily draws, ending with both sides performing "strategical withdrawals". So, with these rules simulating so neatly every (or almost every) factor of a WWI naval engagement, you have to consider as a major victory when you can blow up a capital ship or a new Battlecruiser, a draw when both fleets head home with all the big ships still afloat.
Maybe, WWI naval wargaming can be fully enjoyed only with a campaign setted, where you have to consider each loss on a prospective.